LINKSCampaign PagesRecent EntriesNew Minister to push for smartcard
Tuesday, June 16 2009 The Card is Baaaaack! Monday, March 17 2008 Access Card - 2006 version - is GONE ! Tuesday, November 27 2007 Labor sees the Light on the Hill Saturday, October 20 2007 Access Card - Going,Going......... but not quite gone. Wednesday, June 6 2007 Delay a good start - now drop the Card Tuesday, June 5 2007 Democrats unearth untruth on Access Card website Monday, June 4 2007 Access Card No Way Convener honoured Sunday, June 3 2007 Contact and Lobby MPs NOW! Tuesday, May 29 2007 Geoffrey Blainey on May 23 - a lesson to be learnt Friday, May 25 2007 |
Wednesday, June 6. 2007Access Card - Going,Going......... but not quite gone.Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Tim; I thought I would pass this on- belatedly, but I felt you could use it.
Barr Opposes Provision in Immigration Bill Urges Senate to Drop National ID Proposal Wednesday, June 06, 2007 at 12:30 PM Atlanta, GA, – Former Congressman Bob Barr, who has offered general support for the Immigration Bill currently pending in the U.S. Senate, has taken strong exception to a particular section hidden deep within the massive bill that requires the use of a REAL ID. The REAL ID Act was passed by Congress in 2005 and, once it takes full effect in two years, would mandate that all state drivers’ licenses adhere to federal standards in order to be accepted for any “federal purpose,” such as airline travel, obtaining federal benefits or access to any federal facility. Under the provision in the immigration reform bill, a REAL ID Act-compliant driver’s license would be one of only two forms of identification a U.S. citizen could use lawfully to obtain or retain employment; the only other being a passport. Barr has now written to key members of the U.S. Senate urging that the REAL ID Act provision in the immigration bill be removed. For one thing, Barr said, “no America citizen should have to prove to a government entity who they are in order to obtain or retain employment.” “In the second place,” Barr continued, “if such a provision remains, and if a job applicant is a U.S. citizen he or she should be allowed to establish that fact through any number of legitimate identification documents. Thirdly, and most importantly, limiting the permissible forms of identification to those that are REAL ID Act-compliant is especially problematic, given the strong and legitimate concerns with what is essentially a national identification card that the REAL ID Act has engendered.” Barr also noted that already a number of states are enacting legislation that would opt out of the REAL ID Act provisions. Finally, Barr said, “the immigration bill should not be allowed to serve as a stealth REAL ID Implementation Act.” For further information, please visit www.bobbarr.org or contact Taryn Jones at 770.836.1776. Barr, a former Member of Congress (1995-2003), also served previously as a US Attorney and with the Central Intelligence Agency. He is a lawyer and currently works with national organizations on issues related to privacy and national security. THE COALITION GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEAL WITH OR IN OUR BODY PARTS. They are the most fundamentally private, necessary and personal items that we own.
I have been told that the access card is a means of increasing the number of organ donors. This is a problem indeed, but the choice should remain an individual one. I am wondering how the access card is expected to increase the number of organ donors? If people, for whatever reason, choose to exercise rights over their body parts (god forbid that we still have those rights) and do not wish to donate them, then I do not see how the access card will make them change their minds.................. Unless of course, the data is going to be tampered with, changed, and make people involuntary/unwilling donors. A very scary thought about the potential for fiddling with the integrity of such information with NO adequate/effective checks and forms of redress. Can someone refresh my memory on which other political regimes have sought to take control over body parts? Could it have been some political regime in WW2? |
QuicksearchDonateSafe and secure PayPal, will accept payments from Visa, MasterCard and PayPal transfers.Blog Administration |